Guidelines for Establishing Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Programs

Guidelines for Establishing Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Programs

On November 21, 2023, the National Technology Validation Collaborative Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Collaborative (NTVIC) Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) Policy and Procedure Committee published Guidelines for establishing FIGG programs in the Forensic Science International: Synergy journal [1]. This version was the second publication of FIGG draft policies and procedures, following feedback and revisions prompted by publication the first version of the document on February 15, 2023 [2]. The purpose of the document is to provide guidance towards establishing best practices for establishing programs and conducting FIGG, which can be applied at the discretion of FIGG responsible authorities. The scope of the document includes terminology and definitions, organizational approaches for establishing a FIGG program, and considerations for development of FIGG policy and procedures. These policy and procedures include case qualification and triaging, utilization of genetic genealogy databases, obtaining third-party DNA samples, obtaining putative perpetrator DNA reference samples, uses of certain genetic information and restrictions, privacy/protection of information, retention, release and expungement of information. FIGG education and training, Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC), case reporting, oversight and potential metrics are also discussed. The oversight and use of best practices in the forensic science enterprise is very challenging, as outside of the FBI National DNA Index System (NDIS) infrastructure, there is no centralized organization mandating structure, organization and operation of forensic science service providers (FSSPs). Therefore, volunteer efforts such at the NTVIC have become established to coalescence forensic science service providers around resolving common issues and striving toward common goals. These common goals include validating new technology, establishing common model policies and procedures, and sharing training, to lift FSSPs together as a group toward higher implementation capability, while benefiting by group learning and information and expertise sharing. This presentation will include the most controversial or misunderstood FIGG related topics among those within the NTVIC guidance publication. Ethical, legal and practical implications of these topics will be discussed. The forensic profile is obtained from biological material discarded at the crime scene by the putative perpetrator. As these samples are abandoned there is no presumed right to privacy, and therefore it is available for extensive genetic investigation, well beyond entry into CODIS (Combined DNA Index System). In fact, with individuals committing these crimes still at large, it falls squarely upon law enforcement to interrogate forensic samples to solve crime. Sampling of individuals known to not have committed the crime and their subsequent indirect matching to the forensic profile in pursuit of potential biological relatives must be done with informed consent and respect, to establish and maintain trust in FSSPs and FIGG responsible authorities. Individuals may express their autonomy to assist law enforcement in solving crimes where the subject remains at large, potentially committing new crimes on new victims. As the unsolved crimes that are FIGG prime candidates are a major public safety issue, establishment of best practices and policy should be accomplished before the pressure of solving a high-profile major case commences. The NTVIC guidelines for establishing FIGG programs are a model for implementation of new technology. Forensic DNA scientists are at the forefront of solving crime with science. Developing, publishing and utilizing shared best practices enables all FSSPs to participate and benefit from joint initiative. The result is more efficient and effective application of forensic technology to solve crime. This presentation will provide an overview of the guidelines as the first of multiple new jointly developed policy and procedures, published in open-source journals, to support our scientists and their pursuit of crime solving excellence.

 

1. Ray A. Wickenheiser, Jennifer Naugle, Brian Hoey, Rylene Nowlin, Swathi A. Kumar, Mark A. Kubinski, Claire Glynn, Raymond Valerio, Lance Allen, Stephanie Stoiloff, Jennifer Kochanski, Christi Guerrini, Anne Marie Schubert, National Technology Validation and Implementation Collaborative (NTVIC): Guidelines for establishing Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) programs, Forensic Science International: Synergy, Volume 7, 2023, 100446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100446 2. Ray A. Wickenheiser, Jennifer Naugle, Brian Hoey, Rylene Nowlin, Swathi A. Kumar, Alana Minton, Lance Allen, Claire Glynn, National Technology Validation and Implementation Collaborative (NTVIC) policies and procedures for Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG), Forensic Science International Synergy 6 (2023) 100316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100316

On November 21, 2023, the National Technology Validation Collaborative Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Collaborative (NTVIC) Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) Policy and Procedure Committee published Guidelines for establishing FIGG programs in the Forensic Science International: Synergy journal [1]. This version was the second publication of FIGG draft policies and procedures, following feedback and revisions prompted by publication the first version of the document on February 15, 2023 [2]. The purpose of the document is to provide guidance towards establishing best practices for establishing programs and conducting FIGG, which can be applied at the discretion of FIGG responsible authorities. The scope of the document includes terminology and definitions, organizational approaches for establishing a FIGG program, and considerations for development of FIGG policy and procedures. These policy and procedures include case qualification and triaging, utilization of genetic genealogy databases, obtaining third-party DNA samples, obtaining putative perpetrator DNA reference samples, uses of certain genetic information and restrictions, privacy/protection of information, retention, release and expungement of information. FIGG education and training, Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC), case reporting, oversight and potential metrics are also discussed. The oversight and use of best practices in the forensic science enterprise is very challenging, as outside of the FBI National DNA Index System (NDIS) infrastructure, there is no centralized organization mandating structure, organization and operation of forensic science service providers (FSSPs). Therefore, volunteer efforts such at the NTVIC have become established to coalescence forensic science service providers around resolving common issues and striving toward common goals. These common goals include validating new technology, establishing common model policies and procedures, and sharing training, to lift FSSPs together as a group toward higher implementation capability, while benefiting by group learning and information and expertise sharing. This presentation will include the most controversial or misunderstood FIGG related topics among those within the NTVIC guidance publication. Ethical, legal and practical implications of these topics will be discussed. The forensic profile is obtained from biological material discarded at the crime scene by the putative perpetrator. As these samples are abandoned there is no presumed right to privacy, and therefore it is available for extensive genetic investigation, well beyond entry into CODIS (Combined DNA Index System). In fact, with individuals committing these crimes still at large, it falls squarely upon law enforcement to interrogate forensic samples to solve crime. Sampling of individuals known to not have committed the crime and their subsequent indirect matching to the forensic profile in pursuit of potential biological relatives must be done with informed consent and respect, to establish and maintain trust in FSSPs and FIGG responsible authorities. Individuals may express their autonomy to assist law enforcement in solving crimes where the subject remains at large, potentially committing new crimes on new victims. As the unsolved crimes that are FIGG prime candidates are a major public safety issue, establishment of best practices and policy should be accomplished before the pressure of solving a high-profile major case commences. The NTVIC guidelines for establishing FIGG programs are a model for implementation of new technology. Forensic DNA scientists are at the forefront of solving crime with science. Developing, publishing and utilizing shared best practices enables all FSSPs to participate and benefit from joint initiative. The result is more efficient and effective application of forensic technology to solve crime. This presentation will provide an overview of the guidelines as the first of multiple new jointly developed policy and procedures, published in open-source journals, to support our scientists and their pursuit of crime solving excellence.

 

1. Ray A. Wickenheiser, Jennifer Naugle, Brian Hoey, Rylene Nowlin, Swathi A. Kumar, Mark A. Kubinski, Claire Glynn, Raymond Valerio, Lance Allen, Stephanie Stoiloff, Jennifer Kochanski, Christi Guerrini, Anne Marie Schubert, National Technology Validation and Implementation Collaborative (NTVIC): Guidelines for establishing Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) programs, Forensic Science International: Synergy, Volume 7, 2023, 100446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100446 2. Ray A. Wickenheiser, Jennifer Naugle, Brian Hoey, Rylene Nowlin, Swathi A. Kumar, Alana Minton, Lance Allen, Claire Glynn, National Technology Validation and Implementation Collaborative (NTVIC) policies and procedures for Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG), Forensic Science International Synergy 6 (2023) 100316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100316

Workshop currently at capacity. A waitlist is available to join on our registration page.

Brought to you by

Worldwide Association of Women Forensic Experts

Dr. Claire Glynn

Associate Professor, University of New Haven

Dr. Glynn, who joined the University of New Haven in 2014, teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses in forensic science, focused on forensic biology, forensic DNA analysis, and forensic/investigative genetic genealogy (F/IGG). Her research interests are focused F/IGG, and a broad range of applications for this novel investigatory tool. This includes investigating the effects of degraded samples and novel technologies, establishing best practices, the international feasibility of this tool, historical applications, and ethical considerations, to name just a few. Her other research interests include Rapid DNA analysis, RNA (mRNA and miRNA) analysis, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNPs) applications, and DNA Methylation markers.

Speaker Image

Ray Wickenheiser

Retired Director for the New York State Police Crime Lab System

Dr. Ray Wickenheiser, is the retired Director of the New York State Police Crime Laboratory System, formerly headquartered in Albany, New York.  Ray is now located in Lafayette, Louisiana, where he provides forensic consulting and training. His areas of expertise include crime lab administration, quality management, conflict resolution, forensic DNA and mixture interpretation, serology, hair and fiber trace evidence, physical matching and comparison, glass fracture analysis, forensic grain comparison and forensic investigative genetic genealogy. 

Speaker Image

Submit Question to a speaker